The Financial Accounting Standards Board
These are the guys who set the rules for all accounting here in the United States. I'm talking about FASB 157. If you go to the website you can download the 158 Page document and read it for yourself, or I have a metaphor to illustrate what it is and why it's important.
PUT ON YOUR METAPHOR HATS...
I own a Taxi Company, Mike's Taxi Service. I have 10 Taxis. I bought the Taxis's over the last couple of years. Each Taxi cost me $10,000 (they are very cheap taxis).
Using basic math skills, you can see my 10 taxi fleet cost me a total of $100,000 - right? (10 x 10,000 = 100,000)
Unfortunately, I hired the wrong cab drivers. It seems they never checked the oil and now half of the fleet is broken down with blown motors. If I needed to sell my broken Taxi Cabs I might get $500 each in the state they are in. Since they have blown motors, my Mechanic Louie has resorted to calling them "Non Performing Assets".
Along comes Nick. He wants to buy my company and asks to look at my financials to better gauge the true value of my company. My books show that I bought 10 Cabs for $10,000, I have depreciated them a little bit over the last couple of years ($1,000 total) so according to my accountant, the Mike's Taxi Fleet is worth a cool $99,000! (100,000 - 1,000 = 99,000)
Hey, I know it's not their true and realistic value, but it looks cool on the Quickbooks Balance Sheet and as a side benefit it also looks like I'm doing really well!
After Nick reviewed my books, he bought my company for full book value - $99,000. Only problem was that a week later he found out about Louie's "Non Performing Assets" in the back of the garage. Boy was Nick mad. The real value of the 5 blown up cabs was more like $2,500 - not the $49,500 I was showing. Oooops. Sorry Nick.
REALITY BITES
In real life my metaphoric Taxi Cabs symbolize large securitized pools of mortgages. And as you might guess, like my Taxi's, some of those mortgages are not performing so well. Their value might not be all they are cracked up to be. How that value is determined was somewhat up to various levels of interpretation. What the banks, pension funds, hedge funds used to do is dump all these broken bits into a big bucket called Level 3. They hid the bucket in the back of the garage. They put a value on that bucket, much like I did with my broken down Cabs. And this used to be perfectly OK.
Starting November 15th, the rules set forth by FASB 157 change how that value is determined. They are shining the light on these buckets and we'll now get to see what's really in there and more importantly what the bucket is worth.
SMALL BUCKETS AND BIG BUCKETS
Here's a fun little tidbit I ran into the other day. It seems most all the boys have buckets. According to their SEC filings (Form 8-K) some of them have pretty big buckets. Remember when Merrill Lynch announced a couple of weeks ago that they had discovered they had a bigger bucket? Cool. The Merrill bucket is now at 16 Billion!
Just for giggles, here's some of the others;
- Bear Stearns $20 Billion
- Lehman Brothers $35 Billion
- Goldman Sachs $72 Billion
- Morgan Stanley $88 Billion
- Citigroup $135 Billion
Those are some pretty big buckets. Want a little good news? Bear Sterns just announced the worst of the Sub Prime mess is now behind them. No really. They said that!
Remember the good folks at FASB are looking out for the little people like you and me! And on the bright side, now you know more about Taxi's, Level 3 Buckets, FASB 157, and how not to trust financial statements much more than you did before! Cool.
Next we'll talk about other ways to hide other bad things like Herpes Sores and Super SIV Funds.

This post brought to you courtesy of Mike Mueller.
Feel free to ReBlog or ReTweet as you like as long as you credit the source (him).
Did you know? He's for hire! He builds Blogs, Graphic Images and Widgets and Facebook Pages and besides… He knows lots of really cool stuff.
| Hire Mike (925) 456-4567 | Sample Facebook Pages: View on Flickr |
Sponsored Links: (check these guys out!)
Did you know?







Mike,
To me it seems like Good news! but we will have to see first! how they handle all of the what the Mortgage Mess left behind.
Tom Weiss
John - Good question. It'll be used to report the current buckets but on financial statements going forward. People wonder why Merrill announced the discovery of their bigger bucket. I think it was a pre-emptive play to diffuse a later much larger write down. Why were they first? They have the smallest Level 3 Bucket of all their competitors.
Jeanean - Thank you! I love the Lost in the Sauce! Don't tell anyone but we all are.
Tom - Nope - it's bad news. Good news in that it'll provide better financial transparency (almost). Bad News in that soon all of the big guys will have huge write offs in the coming months. To me it's unbelievable that Bear Stearns could state that the worst is behind them. Who are they fooling?
We can also open up the whole Super SIV B.S. - This is another complete smoke and mirror play to keep from reporting the bad stuff.
Lane - That's a very good question. If they can't toss a future REO into the Level 3 Bucket and effectively hide it, will they be forced to continue as a REO? And if so, how does that effect their balance sheet? I reported a strange goings on in which I believe a very large lender is cherry picking who it forecloses on and who it doesn't. I have a client who might very well go a full year without making a single payment and still no NOD! See: The tale of two cities
Mike- ;0) Got You..... Double edged, it always is with these big banks.
Tom Weiss
Tom - That, AND certain non financial aspects of the rule might be delayed for up to a year according to the news. In the end, the thing to remember is a company (any company) is only going to disclose what they are required to do. If they can hide or misguide within the letter of the law, and it helps the company in doing so in any way - they will.
Michael - LOL!
Paul - They are indeed postponing a part of the ruling but it is the part that doesn't effect the portion that our bad loans are in. The portion that is being delayed is the NON Financial. Here's the updated Press Release. Online chatrooms? Isn't that dangerous? Kind of like conversing with bloggers? ; )
Very good clear and concise post... most people, and as I hear from another post today, even mortgage loan originators dont understand what all this is about...
Glad you were able to post it so cleanly...